A BBC fez um "timeline" bem interessante sobre os crimes sexuais cometidos por Assange, está no seguinte endereço: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11949341.
Assange não chegou a Estocolmo por acaso.Ele foi convidado para uma palestra (Guerra e Liberdade de Expressão). Mas Assange aterrisou na Suécia movido por outros objetivos: aquele é um país de grande liberdade de imprensa e democrático. Assange, no sétimo dia de sua permanência, pediu visto de residência porque pretendia montar ali a sede da Wikileaks.
Mas tudo deu errado por conta de duas denúncias, Miss A e Miss W, uma disse que foi estuprada e outra molestada, os fatos ocorreram em agosto de 2010.
A promotora do caso é a Sra. Marianne Ny que disse: There is reason to believe that a crime has been committed," she says in a statement. "Considering information available at present, my judgement is that the classification of the crime is rape."
(existem razões para acreditar que um crime foi cometido, considerando as informações disponíveis até o momento, meu julgamento é que ocorreu um crime de estupro.")
 |
| Marianne Ny, promotora sueca que denunciou Assange |
Abaixo:
Timeline: sexual allegations against Assange in Sweden
Key dates in the case involving the founder of Wikileaks,
Australian journalist and activist Julian Assange, who is fighting extradition
to Sweden to face sexual assault claims, which he denies.
16 August 2012
Ecuador grants asylum to Mr Assange, saying there are fears his human rights might be violated if he is extradited. Foreign minister Ricardo Patino says the country is being loyal to its tradition of protecting those who were vulnerable. Mr Assange describes it as a "significant victory", but the UK government expresses its disappointment.15 August 2012
Ecuador's foreign minister claims the UK has issued a "threat" to enter the Ecuadorian embassy in London to arrest Mr Assange. The Foreign Office says it reminded Ecuador that it has the power to revoke the diplomatic immunity of an embassy on UK soil and says Britain has a legal obligation to extradite him.19 June 2012
Ecuador's foreign minister says Mr Assange has applied for political asylum at Ecuador's embassy in London.14 June 2012
The Supreme Court dismisses Mr Assange's bid to reopen his appeal against extradition, branding it "without merit".30 May 2012
The Supreme Court rules that he should be extradited to Sweden to face the charges against him. The judges rule by majority that the Swedish public prosecutor seeking his return is a judicial authority, dismissing Mr Assange's challenge. He has 14 days to challenge the ruling.5 December 2011
Mr Assange wins the right to petition the UK Supreme Court directly after judges rule that his case raised "a question of general public importance".2 November 2011
At an appeal hearing, two judges at the UK High Court uphold the decision to extradite Mr Assange to Sweden over the sex crimes allegations.13 July 2011
The High Court defers a decision on Mr Assange's appeal against extradition.12 July 2011
Lawyers ask the High Court to block Mr Assange's extradition to Sweden. Ben Emmerson QC says Mr Assange is a victim of a "mismatch" between English and Swedish law on what constitutes a sex crime.3 March 2011
Lawyers lodge papers at the High Court for an appeal against extradition.24 February 2011
At Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in south London, District Judge Howard Riddle rules that Mr Assange should be extradited to Sweden.7 February 2011
Lawyers for Mr Assange tell a UK extradition hearing there is a risk of "denial of justice" if the Wikileaks founder is tried for rape in Sweden. They accuse the prosecutor of having a "biased view" against men.At the two day hearing they also say prosecutors did not follow "proper procedure" while investigating the rape claims.
16 December 2010
Mr Assange is granted bail by Mr Justice Ouseley at the High Court and is freed after his supporters pay £240,000 in cash and sureties.14 December 2010
Judges award bail to Mr Assange, but prosecutors immediately announce that they will appeal, and he is sent back to jail until a higher court can address the issue.8 December 2010
The Wikileaks founder gives himself up to London police and is taken to an extradition hearing at a Westminster court. He is remanded in custody pending another hearing on 14 December.30 November 2010
Interpol issues a "red notice" for Mr Assange, asking people to contact police if they have any information about his whereabouts.20 November 2010
Swedish police issue an international arrest warrant for Mr Assange via Interpol.18 November 2010
Stockholm District Court approves a request to detain Mr Assange for questioning on suspicion of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion. Sweden's Director of Prosecution Marianne Ny says he has not been available for questioning.Mr Assange's British lawyer Mark Stephens says his client offered to be interviewed at the Swedish embassy in London or Scotland Yard or via video link. He accuses Ms Ny of "abusing her powers" in insisting that Mr Assange return to Sweden.
18 October 2010
The Wikileaks founder is denied residency in Sweden. No reason is given, although an official on Sweden's Migration Board tells the AFP news agency "he did not fulfil the requirements".1 September 2010
Swedish Director of Prosecution Marianne Ny says she is reopening the rape investigation against Mr Assange, eleven days after a chief prosecutor announced the arrest warrant had been dropped. Ms Ny is also head of the department that oversees prosecution of sex crimes in particular."There is reason to believe that a crime has been committed," she says in a statement. "Considering information available at present, my judgement is that the classification of the crime is rape."
Ms Ny says the investigation into the molestation claim will also be extended. She tells AFP that overturning another prosecutor's decision was "not an ordinary (procedure), but not so out of the ordinary either".
31 August 2010
Mr Assange is questioned by police for about an hour in Stockholm and formally told of the allegations against him, according to his lawyer at the time, Leif Silbersky. The activist denies the charges.21 August 2010
The arrest warrant is withdrawn. "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape," says one of Stockholm's chief prosecutors, Eva Finne.Ms Rosander says the investigation into the molestation charge will continue but it is not a serious enough crime for an arrest warrant.
The lawyer for the two women, Claes Borgstrom, lodges an appeal to a special department in the public prosecutions office.
20 August 2010
The Swedish Prosecutor's Office issues an arrest warrant for Julian Assange. Karin Rosander, head of communications, says there are two separate allegations - one of rape and one of molestation.Both women reportedly say that what started as consensual sex became non-consensual.
Wikileaks quotes Mr Assange as saying the accusations are "without basis" and that their appearance "at this moment is deeply disturbing". A later message on the Wikileaks Twitter feed says the group has been warned to expect "dirty tricks".
18 August 2010
Mr Assange applies for a residence permit to live and work in Sweden. He hopes to create a base for Wikileaks there, because of the country's laws protecting whistle-blowers.17 August 2010
Mr Assange reportedly has sex with a woman he met at the seminar on 14 August, identified as "Miss W".Some time between 17 and 20 August, "Miss W" and "Miss A" - the woman who arranged his speaking trip - are in contact and apparently share with a journalist the concerns they have about aspects of their respective sexual encounters with Mr Assange.
Um comentário:
Eu acho curioso: a Suécia JAMAIS deu vazão pública a casos de estupro. Aliás, já foi classificada com "leniente" nos processos de violência sexual.
De repente, Assange surge e é acusado de estuprador. O caso vai para a internet, e em algumas horas, já temos o carimbo na testa de Assange.
Aí, ele vai à polícia. Está no timeline. A investigação não dá em nada. E surge uma delegada, luzes nela, e diz, ao contrário de tudo que foi investigado até o momento, que precisamos de mais investigação.
Maia, é óbvio que o caso é político. O timeline é explicito nisso. Por que não entrevistaram Assange na embaixada? Eles poderiam, legalmente fazer isso.
Por que insistir na extradição? A explicação de que o "caso é grave" não convence ninguém.
Depois, li por aí que as acusações não têm como ser provadas, justamente por que houve sexo consensual. É a palavra das mulheres contra a de Assange.
Fosse qualquer um não famoso, o caso jamais existiria. Como Assange atrai muita atenção, o caso virou esse embróglio aí.
Postar um comentário